When Nadeem used the tool identify your competency pattern he noticed that his strongest dimension was Collective Intelligence, followed by Humanity and Wholeness as he loved to look at the bigger picture. He was a brilliant facilitator and felt most at ease when he could help people have a fruitful dialogue and better interactions. Yet, he realized that a new challenge was awaiting him—the actual management (not facilitation) of a complex project with high funder expectations, a private sector requesting key performance indicators, and implementing partners that were not used to being tightly managed. He identified Future Possibilities as his personal development area as he saw that the challenge was not only facilitating, but also getting the job done and being accountable for ambitious targets set. Yet, when he looked at his strength, he decided that he could use them as a starting point. As a “people-person” he decided to embark on an inquiry and engagement process with the different partners and stakeholders in the project. He termed the exercise ‘stakeholder interviews’, a simple process that required not more than 10 minutes time from each of the interview partners. He chose ten people from the range of partners to represent the variety of stakeholders. He set up phone calls or meetings and only asked a single question: From your point of view, what is the single most important move that will make this collaboration initiative a success? He used the action plan tool not for planning, but for filling in interview results allocating them to the different dimensions. The outcome was striking. It showed the frightening disparity of opinions about how to run the project, but it also became clear that every stakeholder had a piece of truth that hinted at one or several of the dimensions of the Compass. In addition, he used the tool identify a challenge pattern to assess how he saw the collaboration culture. He realized that indeed the biggest challenge in the project was dialogic exchange and iterative learning (Collective Intelligence), followed by a clear weakness in Innovation and a total lack of mutual support (Wholeness).